Composing with AI

References

Anderson, Salena Sampson. (2023). “Places to stand”: Multiple metaphors for framing ChatGPT's corpus. Computers and Composition, 68, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102778

Barnett, Sofia. (2023, Jan. 30). ChatGPT is making universities rethink plagiarism. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-college-university-plagiarism/

Baron, Dennis. (2000). From pencils to pixels. In Gail E. Hawisher and Cynthia L. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st-century technologies (pp. 15–33). Utah State UP and National Council of Teachers of English.

Bear, Julia B., & Collier, Benjamin. (2016). Where are the women in Wikipedia? Understanding the different psychological experiences of men and women in Wikipedia. Sex Roles, 74, 254–265. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0573-y

Beveridge, Aaron, Figueiredo, Sergio C., & Holmes, Steve. (Eds.). (2020). Composing algorithms: Writing (with) rhetorical machines. Computers and Composition, 57.

Britton, James. (1982). Spectator role and the beginnings of writing. In Marty Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 149–169). Academic.

Burns, Hugh. (1983). A note on composition and artificial intelligence. Computers and Composition, 1, 3–4.

Chen, Lan, Chen, Xi, Wu, Shiyu, Yang, Yaqi, Chang, Meng, & Zhu, Hengshu. (2023, Apr. 20). The future of ChatGPT-enabled labor market: A preliminary study. arXiv. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2304.09823

Cooper, Kindra. (2021, Nov. 1). OpenAI GPT-3: Everything you need to know. Springboard, 1. https://www.springboard.com/blog/data-science/machine-learning-gpt-3-open-ai/

Cotton, Debby R. E., Cotton, Peter A., & Shipway, J. Reuben. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Crider, Jason, Greene, Jacob, & Morey, Sean. (2020). Digital daimons: Algorithmic rhetorics of augmented reality. Computers and Composition, 57, 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102579

Cummings, Robert. (2009). Lazy virtues: Teaching writing in the age of Wikipedia. Vanderbilt UP.

Cuthbertson, Anthony. (2023, Apr. 5). Germany considers ChatGPT ban. Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/chatgpt-ban-germany-ai-privacy-b2314487.html

Dehouche, Nassin. (2021). Plagiarism in the age of massive Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT-3). Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 21, 17–23. doi:10.3354/esep00195

Gallagher, John R. (2020). The ethics of writing for algorithmic audiences. Computers and Composition, 57, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102583

Geher, Glenn. (2023, Jan. 6). ChatGPT, artificial intelligence, and the future of writing. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/darwins-subterranean-world/202301/chatgpt-artificial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-writing

Gruwell, Leigh. (2015). Wikipedia’s politics of exclusion: Gender, epistemology, and feminist rhetorical (in)action. Computers and Composition, 37, 117–131. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.06.009

Heaven, Will Douglas. (2023, Apr. 6). ChatGPT is going to change education, not destroy it. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/04/06/1071059/chatgpt-change-not-destroy-education-openai/

Heikkilä, Melissa. (2023, Feb. 7). Why detecting AI-generated text is so difficult (and what to do about it). MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/02/07/1067928/why-detecting-ai-generated-text-is-so-difficult-and-what-to-do-about-it/

Herrington, Anne, & Moran, Charles. (2001). What happens when machines read our students’ writing? College English, 63(4), 480–499.

Huang, Xinyi, Zou, Di, Cheng, Gary, Chen, Xieling, & Xie, Haoran. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 112–131. doi:10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0009

Hussain, Suhauna. (n.d.). Reddit may finally be cracking down on hate. Los Angeles Times. https://enewspaper.latimes.com/infinity/article_share.aspx?guid=3bb2c9e0-8bed-407c-baf4-d1597f253078

Johnson, Arianna. (2023, Jan. 31). ChatGPT in schools: Here’s where it’s banned—And how it could potentially help students. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ariannajohnson/2023/01/18/chatgpt-in-schools-heres-where-its-banned-and-how-it-could-potentially-help-students/

Kerner, Sean Mchael. (2023, Apr.). Large language model (LLM). TechTarget. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/large-language-model-LLM

Kinneavy, James E. (1969). The basic aims of discourse. College Composition and Communication, 20(5), 297–304. doi:10.2307/355033

Lam, Shyong K., Uduwage, Anuradha, Dong, Zhenhua, Sen, Shilad, Musicant, David R., Terveen, Loren, & Riedl, John. (2011). WP:clubhouse? An exploration of Wikipedia’s gender imbalance. WikiSym ’11: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 1–10. doi:10.1145/2038558.2038560

Mak, Aaron. (2018, Apr. 12). Reddit CEO clarifies that racism isn’t ‘welcome’ on site, even though it’s allowed. Slate. https://slate.com/technology/2018/04/racist-speech-not-banned-on-reddit-ceo-claims.html

Martindale, Jon. (2023, Apr. 12). These are the countries where ChatGPT is currently banned. Digital Trends. https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/these-countries-chatgpt-banned/

Newton, Derek. (2023, Jan. 24). The big, profitable education race to detect ChatGPT. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereknewton/2023/01/24/the-big-profitable-education-race-to-detect-chatgpt/

Purdy, James P. (2009). When the tenets of composition go public: A study of writing in Wikipedia. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), W351–373. https://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/CCC/0612-dec09/CCC0612When.pdf

Rosenblatt, Kalhan. (2023, Jan. 5). ChatGPT banned from New York City Public Schools’ devices and networks. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/new-york-city-public-schools-ban-chatgpt-devices-networks-rcna64446

Satariano, Adam. (2023, Mar. 31). ChatGPT is banned in Italy over privacy concerns. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/31/technology/chatgpt-italy-ban.html

Sharma, Mukul. (2023, Mar. 22). ChatGPT ban? Companies formulate new policies to regulate use of artificial intelligence. WION News. https://www.wionews.com/technology/chatgpt-ban-companies-formulate-new-policies-to-regulate-use-of-artificial-intelligence-574401

Weissman, Jeremy. (2023, Feb. 8). ChatGPT is a plague upon education. Inside Higher Ed, https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2023/02/09/chatgpt-plague-upon-education-opinion

Wodecki, Ben. (2023, Jan. 6). ChatGPT and AI text generator tools banned by ML event. AI Business. https://aibusiness.com/nlp/chatgpt-and-ai-text-generator-tools-banned-by-ml-event

Wodecki, Ben. (2023, Feb. 24). JPMorgan joins other companies in banning ChatGPT. AI Business. https://aibusiness.com/verticals/some-big-companies-banning-staff-use-of-chatgpt

Journal and Publisher AI Policies in Corpus

Boyd-Graber, Jordan, Okazaki, Naoaki, & Rogers, Anna. (2023). ACL 2023 policy on AI writing assistance. Accountability in Research (ACL) Conference. https://2023.aclweb.org/blog/ACL-2023-policy/

arXiv. (n.d.). Policy for authors’ use of generative AI language tools. Arxiv Content Moderation. https://info.arxiv.org/help/moderation/index.html#policy-for-authors-use-of-generative-ai-language-tools

Computers and Composition. (2023). Declaration of generative AI in scientific writing. Guide for Authors. https://www.elsevier.com/journals/computers-and-composition/8755-4615/guide-for-authors

Elsevier. (2023). The use of AI and AI-assisted writing technologies in scientific writing. https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/publishing-ethics/the-use-of-ai-and-ai-assisted-writing-technologies-in-scientific-writing

Journal of the American Medical Association. (2023). Authorship criteria and contributions. JAMA Network. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/pages/instructions-for-authors

Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Authorship. Ethics. https://academic.oup.com/pages/authoring/journals/preparing_your_manuscript/ethics#Authorship

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (2023, Feb. 21). The PNAS Journals outline their policies for ChatGPT and generative AI. https://www.pnas.org/post/update/pnas-policy-for-chatgpt-generative-ai

Science Journals. (2023). Authorship. Science Journals: Editorial Policies. https://www.science.org/content/page/science-journals-editorial-policies

Stokel-Walker, Chris. (2023, Jan. 18). ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: Many scientists disapprove. Nature, 613(620–621). doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z

Taylor & Francis. (2023). Taylor & Francis clarifies the responsible use of AI tools in academic content creation. https://newsroom.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/taylor-francis-clarifies-the-responsible-use-of-ai-tools-in-academic-content-creation/

World Association of Medical Editors. (2023, May 31). Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts. https://wame.org/page3.php?id=106